The area surrounding
the Epping office was certainly an interesting cultural scenario. Directly
juxtaposed to the public transit system was generally a lower economic class
and is strongly dominated by Koreans. However, the Korean constituency was
quick to fill in gaps by opening up eateries that covered all types of Asian
and Australian cuisines. Further out from the train stations were higher class
suburbs that were mainly populated by middle or upper class white Australians.
This leads to an interesting task for the Member of Parliament for this area;
we had to essentially juggle between making the densely populated Asian area
and the upper class White population happy, which sometimes posed problems. The
Asian area generally favored a more city-centered area with high rates of
development, I.e. high rises, while the suburban folks were more inclined to
reject any ideas that favored population increase. In general, corrospondence
from the surrounding suburbs were usually focused around issues such as traffic
and access to parks while others found issues with development and public
transportation more important. Towards the end of the first day we started
making what would be my schedule for the rest of the summer and I received
great news that made this internship placement one of the best experiences of
my life. I found out that the Epping office was the smallest and furthest of
the three areas that I would be working this summer and that I would only be
working here one day a week to help with data entry.
While
Parliament is sitting, which is a really complicated mix of a schedule that
includes predetermined times as well as random times depending on what type of
issues come to the table, I was to go once a week to help at the State
Parliament House in downtown Sydney. Parliament was sitting for the first three
weeks and the last week of the program. The building itself is a wonderful mix
of old and new architecture and design. The old section contains vast libraries
and the actual Parliament sitting rooms while the newer section was built to
contain temporary working offices for the Members and their staff to research.
My tasks at Parliament house were two fold; sitting in on the less important
meetings and researching current issues. Meetings that I sat in for the
Attorney were usually only peripherally important for his office but ones where
he still needed representation. These ranged from traffic issues to public
transportation meetings and I was to create a short briefing of possible
important factors for our office. The traffic meeting was a bit boring but I
was able to get a sense of how the relationship between people in high
political offices and more layman and citizens react to each other as well as
sense how the power struggle itself is examined within a body of extreme growth
and political strengths. In the beginning these were really interesting in that
I loved seeing the interplay of power and voice between the different agents. However,
this quickly became something that I would dread as the meetings morphed into
exercises of futility and bureaucracy. My other main task while Parliament was
sitting was actually much more rewarding. I essentially combed the internet and
other news sources for any type of policies or feedback that would have any
type of relation to our office. During the sitting of Parliament, there is a
section called “Question Time” in which any member of the opposing party can
ask any question, without warning, to any member of the other party. These were
usually aimed towards the cabinet members, of whom the Attorney General is
included, and are usually used to catch the Member off guard. The task at hand,
for me, was to find any news story or critisism and catch it so that a response
or opinion could be drafted before the opposing party or media could use it
against the Attorney.
The
staff of the Parliament Office and the last office located at Governor
Macquarie Towers (GMT) are the same but differ in locations depending on
whether Parliament is sitting or not. GMT is the modern office building in
which each department of Parliament has working offices throughout the year. I
spent the majority of my time at this office and at the Epping office. The 31st
floor of GMT is the Department of Justice, lead by my boss Greg Smith Attorney
General. There are eight people working directly in this office, a couple of
administrative positions and three policy advisors that are assigned different
areas to research and develop. Along with the policy advisors the Attorney’s
Chief of Staff and media advisor works in the office as well. When working at
GMT I go through most of the staff members to see what I can do to help but
usually focused on the policy advisors because I expressed that I would like to
work on social issues.
One
of the first tasks that I was assigned was to research “Baby safe-haven” laws
throughout the world. Baby Safe-Haven laws and Baby Hatches are public safety
policies that aim to reduce the rate of infant abandonment. Australia doesn’t
have a major problem with infant abandonment when compared to other countries
that have implemented laws such as these; around 15 reported cases a year
compared to 100’s in other areas. However, the Department of Justice had
recently made some major consolidations of departments and needed some public
changes to help gain popularity. A Baby Safe Haven Law of some sort was one of
these possibilities. The Chief Policy Advisor, Agnes Kang, told me to take a
look at policies enacted in other countries with a focus on Canada and the
United Kingdom because of the similar Government structures. I first focused on
instances in recent Australian news stories that would have been avoided with
policies like this then started to find legislation from around the world. I
finished with a brief that summarized my findings. However, the important
aspect of this that I found, which was mostly looked over by the team, was the
social marketing portion. Without the proper flow of information to the
necessary demographics or areas of people a social program like this would not
be successful.
Some
major issues that came up in Question Time while I was present related to the
education of the Aboriginal population. Since occupation the relationship between
the indigenous populations and the more recent immigrants has been precarious
to say the least. Many of the issues are considered to be settled but there is
still a massive amount of poor and uneducated individuals compared to the
normal population. Indigenous people living in Sydney are generally assigned
housing in the same area and these areas are usually considered to be bad parts
of town. Since the first shuttle from the airport I noticed campaigns on
billboards to increase awareness of illiteracy within the Aboriginal
population. The connection with the indigenous population in the United States
is uncanny. It was refreshing, then, when I heard the issue come up in
parliament.
No comments:
Post a Comment